What Does Telegram’s Android Call Flaw Mean For Users?
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

🔍 Read the full analysis: What Does Telegram’s Android Call Flaw Mean For Users? on ThorstenMeyerAI.com

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get hardware and tech essentials delivered free with Prime

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
  • Member-only deals all year
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

TL;DR

Security startup NebuSec disclosed a Telegram for Android call-handling flaw on Oct. 29, saying it could be chained with two other bugs to take control of a phone after the user answered a call. Telegram’s Android version 12.10.4, released in September, contains a code change that matches the described flaw; NebuSec says it has seen no attacks. The full attack chain has not been independently documented publicly, and users should check they have updated.

Security startup NebuSec disclosed a flaw in Telegram for Android on Oct. 29, saying an attacker could use it as part of a chain of three bugs to take control of a phone after its owner answered a call. The relevant code was changed in Telegram Android version 12.10.4, released in September, and NebuSec says it has not seen real-world attacks. The disclosure matters most to people using older Android versions, but the full attack chain has not been independently documented in a public technical report.

NebuSec says the flaw affected Telegram for Android versions 8.6.2 through 12.10.3, spanning March 2022 to September 2026. It describes a memory-handling bug in code for voice calls. According to the company’s chief executive, Eten Zou, that bug alone was not sufficient to take over a device. It had to be combined with a second flaw that leaked information and a third Android exploit that provided root, or administrator-level, access.

NebuSec says the chain worked in private voice calls on ARM64 phones and required the target to answer the call. That makes the scenario one-click, rather than zero-click: a person had to act, even if answering an incoming call can seem routine. The company says an attacker needed an ordinary Telegram account. It has not shown that group calls, Telegram’s iOS app or desktop apps were directly affected.

The source account says a comparison of Telegram’s public Android code for versions 12.10.3 and 12.10.4 found a change consistent with the flaw described. In the earlier code, the app checked that a video-rotation field was present but then read a different field that might be missing; the later version reads the rotation field. That comparison supports the existence of a relevant code change, but does not by itself establish that the entire three-bug attack worked as described.

At a glance
reportWhen: Disclosed Oct. 29, 2026; Android fix re…
The developmentNebuSec disclosed a Telegram for Android call flaw it says could enable a takeover when chained with two other bugs; Telegram had already changed the relevant code in version 12.10.4.
Crypto market snapshot
Fear & Greed Index
51/100 — Neutral
Bitcoin BTC$78,726▼ 3.0%
Ethereum ETH$2,257▼ 4.2%
Tether USDT$0.9986▼ 0.1%
BNB BNB$701.52▼ 7.1%
XRP XRP$1.25▼ 6.0%
USDC USDC$0.9991▼ 0.0%
Solana SOL$96.76▼ 5.5%
TRON TRX$0.3574▲ 8.5%
Live data · CoinGecko · alternative.me (24h change)
Thorsten Meyer AI
Case file

Infographic 01 · Telegram for Android

One tap on “answer”, three bugs, one fix.

What is confirmed, what rests on NebuSec’s word, and what nobody knows yet about the voice-call flaw fixed in Telegram for Android 12.10.4.

12.10.4Telegram for Android version with the fix (source published 24 Sep 2026)
~4.5 yrsvulnerable range per NebuSec: 8.6.2 (March 2022) to 12.10.3 (September 2026)
1 tapthe victim has to answer the call. Declining, or calls set to “Nobody”, blocks it
0CVE numbers assigned. No entry in CISA’s list of exploited bugs either
  1. The callAn ordinary Telegram account calls the victim
  2. The tapThe victim answers. Without this, no attack
  3. Bug 1Call code misreads a status message (MediaState)
  4. Bug 2An information leak helps break out of the app
  5. Bug 3An Android root exploit: messages, mic, camera

Chain as described by NebuSec’s CEO to The Hacker News. Bugs 2 and 3 are not public; no technical write-up exists yet.

Checked myself
  • The bug and the fix match in Telegram’s public source (12.10.3 vs 12.10.4)
  • Same correction in the shared call library on 21 Apr 2026, titled “Fix camera rotation”
  • No CVE in the US vulnerability database (29 Oct)
  • No Telegram entry in CISA’s exploited-bugs catalog (28 Oct)
NebuSec says
  • Three chained bugs give full control of the phone
  • Versions 8.6.2 to 12.10.3 are affected
  • Its GPT-5.4-based product found the bug
  • No real attacks seen; Telegram did not see code execution, paid no bounty
Not known
  • What bugs 2 and 3 are
  • Whether the chain works on fully patched Android
  • Whether the old iOS and desktop code was exploitable
  • Telegram’s own statement
  • Mar 2022Version 8.6.2First version NebuSec names as affected
  • 21 Apr 2026Shared call library fixedtgcalls change “Fix camera rotation”. iOS picks it up in May, desktop in July (per The Hacker News)
  • 24 Sep 2026Android 12.10.4 source published156 days after the library fix (my arithmetic)
  • 26 Sep 2026NebuSec reports to TelegramTelegram acknowledges, does not consider it code execution (per NebuSec)
  • 29 Oct 2026Public disclosurePost on X with a 22-second demo video

Sources: NebuSec on X, 29 Oct 2026; The Hacker News, 29 Oct 2026; Telegram Android source 12.10.3 vs 12.10.4; tgcalls, 21 Apr 2026; NVD search, 29 Oct 2026; CISA KEV 2026.10.28. Status labels and arithmetic: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI

Why Answering a Call Matters

If NebuSec’s account is accurate, the weakness shows how an ordinary app action could be used as an entry point when a vulnerable call-handling component is combined with other flaws. Answering an unfamiliar call would not itself prove that a device was compromised, and the reported takeover depended on a chain rather than this bug alone. Still, the claim gives Android users with older Telegram versions a practical reason to update.

The disclosure also highlights a visibility problem for organizations. The source says the flaw has no CVE number, and it does not appear in the U.S. government’s known-exploited-vulnerabilities catalog as of Oct. 28. Security teams whose tools rely on CVE identifiers may not flag a fix automatically. Organizations can reduce that gap by tracking minimum app versions on work devices and applying their own messaging-app policies.

For individual users, the key distinction is between a reported vulnerability and confirmed exploitation. NebuSec says it has seen no real attacks; that is not proof that no one ever used the flaw. The available information supports checking and updating the app, but it does not establish that every Telegram call, or every older Android phone, was exposed to a successful attack.

Products Worth Considering

Trezor Safe 5 Crypto Hardware Wallet with Color Touchscreen, Black Graphite

Trezor Safe 5 Crypto Hardware Wallet with Color Touchscreen, Black Graphite

Logitech MX Master 4 for Mac, Ergonomic Bluetooth Mouse with Haptic Feedback, Ultra-Fast Scrolling, USB-C Charging, for MacOS, iPadOS, Windo

Logitech MX Master 4 for Mac, Ergonomic Bluetooth Mouse with Haptic Feedback, Ultra-Fast Scrolling, USB-C Charging, for MacOS, iPadOS, Windo

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Fix Predated the Disclosure

NebuSec said it reported the issue to Telegram on Sept. 26, after version 12.10.4 had appeared. Zou told The Hacker News that Telegram acknowledged the report but did not believe the bug could be turned into remote code execution. According to Zou, no CVE was assigned and no bounty was paid. These details are attributed to the company; a public Telegram response was not found in the source account.

The source’s review of Telegram’s public code also found that a shared call library received the same correction on April 21, 2026, in a change titled “Fix camera rotation.” The Android code with the correction appeared later, while The Hacker News reported that iOS and desktop apps incorporated the shared change in May and July. The existence of related changes does not establish that those platforms were exploitable, and NebuSec did not claim direct impact on them.

As of Oct. 29, the source account reported no CVE entry in the U.S. National Vulnerability Database and no Telegram listing in the CISA catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities, using the catalog version dated Oct. 28. Those absences describe the public records checked at that time; they do not determine whether a vulnerability exists or whether an attack occurred.

“Now picking up a wrong call can get you hacked.”

— NebuSec, in a post announcing the flaw on X

What the Public Evidence Cannot Show

The complete exploit chain remains unverified in a public technical write-up. The source says NebuSec’s brief video shows a victim phone responding to a call and then displaying a takeover message, but it does not identify the Telegram or Android versions on that device. The source also says the video does not demonstrate the two additional bugs in enough detail to assess how they were combined.

It is not clear whether the chain works on a current, fully patched Android phone, whether any attacker used the flaw before disclosure, or whether related code in iOS and desktop versions could be exploited. NebuSec says it has seen no real attacks, but that is not the same as proving none occurred. Telegram’s public response and its explanation for the earlier code change were also unavailable in the source material.

Check the App and Call Settings

Android users should check Telegram’s version in Settings and update to 12.10.4 or later if they are running an older release. Until updated, the source recommends setting “Who can call me?” to My Contacts or Nobody and declining calls from unknown people. Those steps reduce exposure to the reported call scenario but do not replace updating the app.

Organizations using Telegram on work phones can check installed versions and set a minimum version requirement. The next useful developments would be a detailed technical account from NebuSec, a public response from Telegram, or further evidence clarifying whether the reported chain affected other platforms or was used in attacks. Until then, the disclosed call-code fix is confirmed in the version comparison described by the source, while the broader takeover claim remains attributed to NebuSec.

Key Questions

Which Telegram Android versions does NebuSec say were affected?

NebuSec says the affected range was versions 8.6.2 through 12.10.3. The relevant code was changed in version 12.10.4, released in September 2026.

Could the flaw hack a phone without the user doing anything?

According to NebuSec, the target had to answer an incoming call, so the reported scenario was one-click, not zero-click. The company says the call flaw also needed two other bugs to enable a full takeover.

Has NebuSec reported real-world attacks?

NebuSec says it has seen no real attacks. That is the company’s account and does not prove that no one used the flaw.

Are Telegram on iPhone or desktop computers confirmed to be affected?

No. The available account says NebuSec had no evidence that iOS, desktop apps or group calls were directly affected. A shared call-library change appeared in other versions, but that alone does not show they were exploitable.

What should Telegram users do now?

Check the Telegram Android version in Settings and update to 12.10.4 or later. Until updated, restrict incoming calls to My Contacts or Nobody and decline calls from unknown people.

Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com

Nothing in this article is financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and precious-metal investments carry significant risk — do your own research and consider a licensed advisor.
You May Also Like

How The Railway Breach Put AI Keys In The Spotlight

Railway says an attacker may have accessed customer environment variables and links the incident to attacks targeting AI inference providers.

Sovereign AI Setup Costs: Forge Vs. Self-Hosting Breakdown

A detailed breakdown compares the costs of Mistral Forge’s managed sovereign AI platform against self-hosted solutions, revealing economic insights for organizations.

Cybersecurity In A World Where AI Speeds Up Attacks

U.S. agencies and Microsoft describe AI-assisted attacks on industrial controllers and cloud tenants, while OpenAI says AI is finding more security flaws.

Forge or Self-Host? The Real Cost of Sovereign AI

An analysis of the costs and challenges of building or buying sovereign AI, revealing that self-hosting is often more expensive than assumed.