🔍 Read the full analysis: Meta, TikTok And Google Take A Stand On Indonesia’s AI Copyright Bill on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get hardware and tech essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a Nov. 11 parliamentary hearing to challenge provisions in Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision. The draft would address payments for news displayed by platforms and copyright rules for AI, but its current text is unavailable and it has not been passed.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in opposing parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a Nov. 11 hearing before lawmakers in Jakarta, Reuters reported. The bill would set terms for platforms’ use of news content, including link previews, and establish copyright rules for artificial intelligence, but it remains under discussion and is not law.
The revision would amend Indonesia’s Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body is now deliberating the draft with the government. At the Nov. 11 hearing, lawmakers heard from Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas.
The companies raised different objections. Google opposed payments for links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training data. It also called for platforms to retain safe-harbor protections. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing the linked material, and said payment requirements could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said AI disclosure rules should not cover cases where AI is used only as an assistive tool, and also asked for safe-harbor protection.
Google’s representative, Agung Pamungkas, said a levy on links could leave the company with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. That is the company’s stated position, not an announced decision to withdraw those services. The exact provisions currently before lawmakers could not be verified against a full draft: the text has reportedly changed since July, and the available accounts refer to different versions.
Platforms challenge proposed rules for news and AI
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a Nov. 11 hearing to challenge parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision. The bill remains under discussion and is not law.
What the proposal covers
The revision would address platform use of news and copyright rules for artificial intelligence.
Links and payments
The debate includes whether platforms should pay publishers for displaying or distributing news, including link previews.
Training and disclosure
Rules could address training data, disclosure of AI use and copyright for work made with human assistance.
Where platforms disagree
| Company | Concerns raised |
|---|---|
| Link payments, centralized licensing, AI training licenses and safe-harbor protections | |
| Meta | Links are not republication; payment rules could reduce publisher traffic and revenue |
| TikTok | Disclosure should not cover AI used only as an assistive tool; sought safe-harbor protection |
What happens next
Parliament’s Legislation Body and the government are still deliberating.
The full draft under discussion was not available, and reports refer to different versions.
Further hearings or negotiations may clarify the proposed rules.
No vote date was identified in the source material.
News Access and AI Training Rules
The proposal puts two disputes into one lawmaking process: whether digital platforms should pay publishers when they display or distribute news, and when copyrighted works may be used to develop AI systems. Any final rules could affect publishers’ revenue and referral traffic, platforms’ handling of news, and the material available to AI developers.
The hearing also showed a sharp disagreement over the effect of current platform practices. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent, according to the source account. Those are figures attributed to the Press Council; the available material does not specify the periods or calculation methods behind them. The figures should not be read as independently established measurements.
For creators and developers, the AI provisions could define whether human-assisted work receives copyright protection, whether AI-generated material must be identified, and what permissions or exceptions apply to training data. The hearing has not settled those questions. The companies’ concerns are arguments in the legislative debate, while the draft’s final language and likely effects remain unknown.
Products Worth Considering
Ledger Flex Cryptocurrency Wallet with 2.8-Inch Touchscreen
Logitech MX Master 4 Ergonomic Wireless Mouse with Haptic Feedback, Graphite
Ledger Flex + Folio Crypto Hardware Wallet
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Draft That Has Changed
Reuters reported on AI provisions in a July draft and quoted Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, as confirming that the draft was authentic. He described it as a proposed first explicit recognition of AI in Indonesia’s copyright law, while stressing that it was not final. The Nov. 11 hearing is a later stage in deliberations, but the available reporting does not establish that the July version matches the text now under review.
As Reuters described the July draft, it would restrict AI from imitating a creator’s “distinctive style,” require disclosure of AI use, and protect AI-assisted works only when they met human-involvement criteria. Fully AI-generated works would be excluded from protection. The draft did not specify how much human involvement would qualify. It also proposed that use of copyrighted works for AI training be handled through fair-use provisions or licensing.
The July account also described compensation for platforms’ aggregation, republication and display of news link previews, with funds directed through state-supervised collective management organisations. It said noncompliance could bring sanctions, including revocation of local business permits. The proposal follows Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. Suryanto told lawmakers that compliance with that regulation was low and it had not worked as intended, according to Aktual.
““The development of generative AI has disrupted the copyright framework.””
— Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, as quoted by Reuters
The Current Bill Text Is Unclear
The full draft under discussion was not available in the source material, and the bill has changed since the version Reuters reported in July. Reports cite different versions, so references at the hearing to specific article numbers should be treated as provisional. The precise obligations, exceptions and sanctions lawmakers are considering cannot be confirmed from the available text.
No vote date was announced in the material provided, and the proposal has not been passed. It is also unclear how lawmakers will define qualifying human involvement in AI-assisted works, how any fair-use or licensing system would operate, whether a single collective body would be required, and what safe-harbor protections would remain. Claims about potential effects on news access, publisher income, investment or AI quality are positions expressed in the debate, not settled outcomes.
Legislators Continue Deliberations
Indonesia’s parliamentary Legislation Body and the government are still deliberating the proposed revision. The next key development will be the publication or confirmation of the version lawmakers are considering, followed by any amendments and a decision on when the bill may be put to a vote. No voting timetable was identified in the source material.
Further hearings or negotiations could clarify how the proposal would treat news links, collective licensing, AI training data, disclosure and safe-harbor protections. Until lawmakers release a settled text and complete the legislative process, platforms, publishers, creators and AI developers should treat the reported provisions as proposals rather than rules in force.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the copyright bill?
No. The proposal remains under discussion by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. The source material reports no vote date.
What parts of the proposal did the platforms challenge?
Google objected to payments tied to news links and snippets, centralized collective licensing and mandatory AI-training licenses. Meta argued that linking is not republication, while TikTok said disclosure rules should not cover AI used only to assist a person’s work. Both Meta and TikTok also raised safe-harbor concerns, according to the source account.
What AI rules appeared in the July draft?
Reuters’ account of the July draft described proposed rules on imitating a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, copyright protection for work with sufficient human involvement, and fair-use provisions or licensing for training data. The draft was not final, and its text may have changed.
Could Google stop showing Indonesian news?
Google said a levy on links could leave it with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news. That was the company’s warning at the hearing, not confirmation that Google has decided to stop those services.
When could lawmakers vote?
The source material gives no announced vote date. The bill is still being deliberated, and the current draft text has not been confirmed.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
